Image
Mitigating the impact of artificial lighting on bats
About this good practice
Published on 06 October 2021
France
This is the good practice's implementation level. It can be national, regional or local.
Artificial light has a negative impact on the roosting and foraging activities of bats. 29 chiropteran species are present in the NCA territory, of which 11 are particularly sensitive to light disturbance (regional conservation status is very high for 2 species and high for 4 species). Light disturbance occurs when the locations of street lights, bat roosting sites and/or bat corridors overlap. Street lights were mapped, and locations of roosting sites were provided by the regional bat group (GCP). Green corridors were used as surrogates for the bat corridors. The mapping exercise revealed eleven zones of light disturbance, 5 of which are of high priority given the conservation status of the species present. The municipalities subsequently employed different light pollution mitigation measures as recommended by the GCP: street light extinction periods, reorientation of the lights and changes in their height (in order to limit the diffusion effect), spectrum mitigation (reduction of blue light), avoidance of lighting vegetation and rock walls, and the creation of light barriers to protect particularly sensitive zones. A specific technical guidance document was printed and distributed to NCA municipalities, recommending impact monitoring in areas where light extinction is implemented and in control areas. So far 3 municipalities have carried out monitoring. In future a ‘dark ecological network’ will be scaled up at NCA scale in collaboration with CEREMA.
Resources needed
Not available
Evidence of success
The 3 municipalities that monitored the effect of light extinction recorded an increase in the number of individuals of lucifugous species and a decrease in the number of individuals of less lucifugous species such as Pipistrella. Light extinction enables light sensitive species to benefit from new territories and previously inaccessible food sources. Light extinction therefore helps to restore ecological connectivity for nocturnal species, and also reduces energy consumption and saves money.
Potential for learning or transfer
This GP appears to be interesting to learn from, particularly if scientific monitoring establishes a good relation between mitigation measures and species activities. It is transferable to other sites but there is a need for complete and precise preliminary studies to adapt mitigation measures to local circumstances. The mitigation measures are quite easy to put in place and develop.
Further information
Website
Good practice owner
You can contact the good practice owner below for more detailed information.
Organisation
Métropole Nice Côte d’Azur / Municipalities
France
Contact
Project Manager